Washington

Battle over the Dakota Access Pipeline is also playing out in courtroom

Morton County Sheriff Kyle Kirchmeier, front, listens to Brian Wesley Horinek, of Oklahoma, outside the New Camp on Pipeline Easement in North Dakota on Wednesday, Oct. 26, 2016. Sheriff Kirchmeier and Cass County Sheriff Paul Laney were at the site where a human barricade stopped traffic on North Dakota Highway 1806. Activists fear the nearly 1,200-mile pipeline could harm cultural sites and drinking water for the Standing Rock Sioux tribe.
Morton County Sheriff Kyle Kirchmeier, front, listens to Brian Wesley Horinek, of Oklahoma, outside the New Camp on Pipeline Easement in North Dakota on Wednesday, Oct. 26, 2016. Sheriff Kirchmeier and Cass County Sheriff Paul Laney were at the site where a human barricade stopped traffic on North Dakota Highway 1806. Activists fear the nearly 1,200-mile pipeline could harm cultural sites and drinking water for the Standing Rock Sioux tribe. The Bismarck Tribune

While protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline garner public attention, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe is also trying to block the $3.8 billion project in the courtroom.

In court filings this summer the tribe asserted it was never adequately consulted about the oil pipeline planned by Energy Transfer Partners of Dallas, Texas.

Rerouted from the company’s original chosen path north of the capital city of Bismarck, N.D., in part to protect municipal wells, the current route sends the pipeline under the Missouri River a half-mile north of the border of the Standing Rock Sioux reservation. The route is just upstream from the tribe’s drinking-water intake.

Pipeline construction so far has been permitted in a fast-track fashion by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Only a short-form assessment of natural resource, cultural or environmental justice concerns was done, with scant if any consultation with the tribe, records show.

As of last week, the tribe’s preferred consultant was still excluded from a survey to investigate damage to its archaeology by construction, notes Tribal Chairman Dave Archambault II. However, the company allowed its own consultants and a North Dakota congressman along.

In its lawsuit, the tribe says its cultural and archaeological sites have already been destroyed by construction, and more are at risk. It also argues its drinking water and that of millions of people downstream are at risk if the pipeline is routed under the Missouri River.

The U.S. Department of the Interior, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and federal Advisory Council on Historic Preservation agreed with the tribe last spring. Each said the review by the Corps was insufficient, overlooking threats to public safety, water quality and the tribe’s cultural and archaeological sites.

The agencies also agreed the tribe had not been adequately consulted, and that a full environmental-impact statement needs to be done.

The Corps disagreed, and has given its go-ahead to the project, except for a crucial easement needed for the pipeline to cross the Missouri River.

Energy Transfer Partners began construction work last spring before it had all of its permits in hand. Now it is in an urgent push to complete the project by the end of the year in order to meet its contracts with shippers, which expire in January, according to court documents.

The company declined to comment, citing ongoing litigation.

The tribe was denied an emergency injunction in federal court to stop construction while its litigation is heard.

However, the Obama administration has announced that no construction on Corps land bordering or under the river will go forward until the Corps decides if it wants to reconsider its earlier permits, and initiates a more thorough review.

Meanwhile, the company is continuing construction of the pipeline toward the Missouri River, with protesters encamped in the path.

  Comments