Arden Tewksbury has been a dairy farmer in northeast Pennsylvania for most of his 83 years. He also is an agricultural activist who is part of a movement to try to stop the loss of family-owned dairy farms across the country because of record-low milk prices, a glut of milk on the world and U.S. markets and reduced federal subsidies.
According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the price of milk in June was about $15 per 100 pounds – more than a 40 percent drop from 2014. Meanwhile, the USDA estimated milk production costs were about $22 per 100 pounds.
In the Pacific Northwest, dairy prices have remained low all year, dipping to $13.67 per 100 pounds in April and May, according to the USDA. In July the uniform price in Washington jumped to $15.19, which remains well below the $24 per 100 pounds regional dairy farmers were getting in April 2014.
In Whatcom County, there are around 100 dairy farms producing about 14 million gallons of milk each month, according to Whatcom Farm Friends.
Sign Up and Save
Get six months of free digital access to The Bellingham Herald
Darrel Aubertine, a former commissioner of the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets, said many small family farms now faced a difficult decision: Sell their operations to larger dairy farms, borrow money to cover costs or diversify into other types of agriculture.
According to a USDA report, the number of family dairy farms decreased from 648,000 in 1970 to 46,005 in 2012, the most recent year for which a figure is available. During that time milk production increased twelvefold.
The retail price of milk hit its high of about $3.86 a gallon in November 2014.
Tewksbury put part of the blame for the stark choices facing today’s dairy farmers on the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996, which allowed the USDA to set the price of milk using a formula that Tewksbury said didn’t take into account the cost of production.
He also blamed the law for cutting federal assistance available to dairy farmers from the Commodity Credit Corp., which provides loans and buybacks of surplus milk.
About 60 members of Congress from dairy states have taken up the cause, sending a letter to Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack in June pointing out what they called the “troubling economic challenges facing U.S. dairy farmers and the entire U.S. dairy industry” due to low milk prices. They urged Vilsack to make “an immediate market financial injection and offer financial assistance that will directly support U.S. dairy farmers equally” under the CCC Charter Act.
The letter suggested many factors had contributed to the record-low milk price, from a surplus of milk in the American and global markets to the 2014 farm bill, which replaced the previous dairy farmer assistance program, the Milk Income Loss Contract program, with a new one, the Dairy Margin Protection Program, which requires farmers to buy into it before they can receive assistance.
The USDA’s semiannual “Dairy: World Markets and Trade Report” agrees with the list of reasons for low U.S. milk prices. And no significant recovery is likely until well into 2017, the USDA predicts.
A USDA spokesperson said the department was concerned about the financial pressures on dairy farmers but was bound by what Congress had mandated in the farm bill. The spokesperson notes that “many in the farm community are facing tight margins.”
In the meantime, the National Farmers Union, in a follow-up letter, has asked the USDA to buy $100 million to $150 million worth of milk products to reduce the surplus.
When Congress reconvenes in September, farmers, activists and academics will be ready with a list of solutions to save small dairy farms. They range from the federal government buying more surplus milk and cheese to tax-free savings accounts. Sen. Robert Casey, D-Pa., has proposed legislation that would set production quotas to control prices.
Danielle Prieur: 248-303-2859, @prieur2016. Bellingham Herald Business Editor Dave Gallagher contributed to this report.