Web search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH for

Whatcom Answers

Editorial Forum

Rules of the Road

Sgt. Tim Coley

360-676-2007

Sergeant Tim Coley works for the Washington State Patrol at the Bellingham Detachment. He will answer your questions about the rules of the road, safe driving habits and general police practices. More information can be found at wsp.wa.gov.



Most Recently Answered Questions



Questions 1 - 10 of 52 (Page 1 of 6)
Q: Sgt. Coley you state "There are some basic rules requiring cyclist to ride as near to the roadway edge as possible and in single file--look to RCW 46.61.770" Look at the statue you quote "Persons riding bicycles upon a roadway shall not ride more than two abreast except on paths or parts of roadways set aside for the exclusive use of bicycles" It clearly states two abreast. Please know the law before you quote it.

A: Marc: Your point is well taken. While I knew the law well enough to provide the citation, I apparently glossed over the exact language in this instance. My mistake, and I will graciously attempt to be more vigilant.
Answered 06/22/09 22:08:10 by Tim Coley
Q: One of the most popular videos right now is the video with the state trooper getting into a fight with a paramedic after he pulled their ambulance over. Is it legal for a police officer to pull an ambulance over? If so, are their rules for doing so?

A: Yes, it is legal for a police officer to stop an ambulance and there are certain limited occasions where it may be prudent to do so--such as if the ambulance has been reported as erratically driven or if it is traveling at excessive speed while not running with emergency lights on. Policy on this would vary from agency to agency, but generally this practice would not be allowed while the ambulance is transporting a patient under urgent circumstances.
Answered 06/22/09 22:06:25 by Tim Coley
Q: When you have a red left turn arrow light, Why is it not O.K. to take a left turn, if it is clear and there is no on-coming traffic, but there is a sign stating "No left turn on red".

A: All of the RCWs regarding turning and moving through intersections have language such as in 46.61.055 (3)(c): "Vehicle operators facing a steady red arrow indication may not enter the intersection control area to make the movement indicated by such arrow." Also, any of the usual allowed turns, such as a right made after coming to a complete stop at a red light, can be limited or prohibited if a sign specifically indicates otherwise, such as "No Right Turn" or "No Turning Between 7am-7pm."
Answered 06/22/09 21:58:17 by Tim Coley
Q: When a car passes a bicycle who is riding close to the left edge, is there a minimum distance the driver must provide the cyclist?

A: RCW 46.61.110 merely requires that a driver "approaching a pedestrian or bicycle that is on the roadway or on the right-hand shoulder or bicycle lane of the roadway shall pass to the left at a safe distance to clearly avoid coming into contact with the pedestrian or bicyclist, and shall not again drive to the right side of the roadway until safely clear of the overtaken pedestrian or bicyclist." There is no specific measurement.
Answered 06/22/09 21:53:31 by Tim Coley
Q: When parking on a hill, a driver is required to turn the front wheels toward (or away from) the curb. I have seen two cars roll away down hill because that wasn't done. I assume there is a law to that effect. Is it ever enforced, and who is charged with enforcing it?

A: The parking RCWs begin at 46.61.560 and describe the places and limitations on parking. The statutes do not, however, provide required techniques such as when to point the wheels or set the parking brake. In the event the car does roll away and strike another vehicle then the regular collision laws would apply including the hit and run statutes under 46.52. This is not to preclude municipalities where there may be more specific parking laws that include how to park and turn your wheels. For safety and driver training, of course, these skills are taught as a preventive measure.
Answered 06/01/09 08:43:02 by Tim Coley
Q: Why are Harley Davidson motorcycles not required to have proper mufflers?

A: The answer is found is RCW 46.37.537, which governs motorcycle equipment. Like so much of the equipment regulation, the basic message of the statute is that the bike must remain or be equal to its stock condition at time of original purchase from a dealer or the factory.
Answered 06/01/09 08:36:27 by Tim Coley
Q: Why is bicycling allowed on Chuckanut Dr.? With roughly six miles of continuous double yellow lines it is often next to impossible to pass the cyclist because of the curves and not to mention the legal aspect of crossing the double yellow lines. I always give the cyclist the benefit and respect of the road but feel the Chuckanut is a separate issue that needs to be dealt with.

A: Bicycling is always allowed on Chuckanut and any roadway unless specifically prohibited. There are some basic rules requiring cyclist to ride as near to the roadway edge as possible and in single file--look to RCW 46.61.770 and those that surround it. The double yellow lines do not play a factor here---they are controlled by RCW 46.61.130 which does allow drivers to move left briefly for a roadway obstruction as long as there is no danger to oncoming traffic.
Answered 06/01/09 08:31:57 by Tim Coley
Q: Sgt Coley - Thanks for moderating the "Rules of the Road" column with some interesting insights. Today's (2/23)answer, however, kind of struck a raw nerve with me. Increasingly there seems to be a tendency for oncoming traffic to expect those already established on the interstate to yield to them. There is a "Yield" sign on the onramps; is this not intended for the oncoming traffic to yield? i.e., the burden is on them to adjust their speed +/- so as to merge into the traffic, is it not? More often than not, merging traffic is not even using turn signals to alert other traffic. If I can easily move over without adjusting my speed I will, but again, the burden to yield is on the oncoming traffic. I've experienced some awfully close calls with oncoming traffic seemingly oblivious to established traffic. ThankYou Mike Holl

A: The answer comes from 46.61.190. This is one of those times where your typical understanding of a yield sign and the reality of driving in different traffic volumes seem to be in contradiction: as you approach the end of a ramp at rush hour, let's say, you know you have more traffic behind you on the ramp because you all were turning on to the interstate from the same traffic signal for example. So drivers behind you are anxious to get on the interstate and traffic may be making full use of the two lanes on the interstate already--I am thinking of northbound at Samish Way or northbound at Iowa. Courtesy would dictate the response you suggest: if possible, freeway traffic would move left to free up the merging lane and space on the right. Clearly this is not always easy and it is ultimately up to the merging traffic to do so safely. Hence the last sentence of the RCW: if...a driver is involved in a collision with a vehicle in the intersection or junction of roadways, after driving past a yield sign without stopping, such collision shall be deemed prima facie evidence of the driver's failure to yield right-of-way.
Answered 06/01/09 08:26:02 by Tim Coley
Q: I received a ticket for "failure to yield right of way when turning left"There was no damage to my vehicle and such slight damage to the other vehicle that no claim was filed. I don't think I should have been given a ticket and a $175.00 fine. Is there a dollar amount of damage for a ticket to be issued? Also, since it was two county vehicles in the incident the county sheriff could not investigate so the state trooper had to come. He said since he came out he had to issue a ticket. True?

A: There is no damage amount that triggers the issuance of a citation. Some agencies do issue citations when fault can be determined in a particular collision. However, there could be plenty of occasions where law enforcement would respond and no citation would be issued, such as a car versus deer collision.
Answered 05/07/09 23:14:09 by Tim Coley
Q: emerging on I-5, aren't we soppose to get our speed up to the speed of the road before entering the road. Or atleast as close to the speed as possiable, following the car ahead of mine that is also emerging ( if there is one)emerging on while the car ahead of me follows me , so I block the lane so the car can emerg safety on. But what about the fast line , does a driver approaching from behind slow down or move over if safe. Are drivers soppose to be putting their brakes on when drivers exit the freeway, before they enter the exit lane, aren't drivers soppose to brake after they exit? it makes me crazy when they do that.

A: You pose two separate issues here, and both are a matter of courtesy and driver training more than the law. You are correct that the purpose of a freeway on ramp is to provide entering traffic the opportunity to accelerate and merge at freeway speed. As I have noted in previous responses, sometimes you encounter parts of the interstate that were designed for different speed limits and traffic volumes, and the ramps become more challenging--particularly at peak travel times. As to your second situation, it is true that you are not supposed to slow or brake until you exit the interstate. Again, this is one of those rules that is nice in theory but sometimes difficult to practice as when a long line of traffic is backed up at a stop light or waiting for someone to turn and causing a slowdown. Either way, it is up to each driver to maintain a safe following distance and be aware of what other vehicles around them are doing.
Answered 05/07/09 23:11:45 by Tim Coley

Ask a question

Your Name:
Your Location (City, State):
Your Email Address:
Receive more information from this Expert?
Your Question: