Masthead

READER CENTER

Photo store (reprints)
Re-use permissions
News archive
Submit news
Submit announcements
Place Obit
Place a classified ad
Jobs at The Herald
Contact us

MARKETPLACE


Find stuff
Place an ad
Sell a car Find a car
Find a home
List a home
Find an apt.
List a rental
On sale
FREE COUPONS!
CLICK HERE

TOP JOBS

LEASING SPECIALIST
Click job title for more info

Web Designer-Frontend Developer
Click job title for more info

Human Resources Assistant
Whatcom Educational Credit Union

Market Director
Bellingham Farmer's Market

Accounting Technician II
Port of Bellingham

Find more jobs at:
Keywords:
Location:
CLICK HERE

SPECIAL SECTIONS

Homebuyers Guide
Primetime
Local History
Neighbors
Whatcom Weddings
Living Here
Local Jobs
102 Things To Do

OUR SITES

Whatcom Magazine
Northwest Professionals Guide
Whatcom Health: Doctor Search
Skagit Health: Doctor Search
GOBham.com
Reader's Choice

Recent Stories

  • Tuesday thumbs: Lynden in state title game and cheating students
  • Holiday Port kicks off season of community activities
  • Monday thumbs: A great schools superintendent and terrorism in India
  • Extend your hand to the needy this holiday season
  • Local shopping will help our economy this season
Aug, 16, 2008

OUR VIEW

Old G-P buildings can go if it means a better waterfront

`

Advertisement


SCOTT AYERS
THE BELLINGHAM HERALD

E-mail
Print
*Beta

Back when talk of redeveloping Bellingham's waterfront began, officials said it might be possible to reuse some of the old industrial buildings on the site.

We thought that odd, considering the heavy industrial and somewhat "dirty" uses that went on inside Georgia-Pacific Corp.'s mill.

But it seemed an exciting idea. What if our new waterfront had old buildings? It seemed like charm and a sense of history would be built in.

Unfortunately, it appears doubts about reusing old pulp kilns and brick buildings laced with pipes, carrying everything from water to chlorine, were on target.

Port of Bellingham officials told the Waterfront Advisory Group last week that not much of what stands on the G-P property today is reusable. The problem: the buildings were built to stand on the outside of heavy machinery, not to hold floors and walls for apartments or shops or offices.

Making one into the other may prove prohibitively expensive.

We encourage officials making decisions on the waterfront redevelopment to quickly abandon, and demolish, the old shells of buildings should they stand in the way of redevelopment.

There is already going to be a high price to pay for environmental concerns and infrastructure, such as roads and water and sewer lines, on the site. Marrying the development to even more outrageous costs for saving old buildings seems likely to create one of two effects; making redevelopment too expensive for developers, or saddling taxpayers with extra costs to save the buildings for redevelopment.

The city and port are already expecting to be on the hook for around $350 million in environmental and infrastructure costs. Given that price tag, and all the complexities of turning a former pulp and paper mill and chemical and chlorine plant into a usable, developable piece of land, adding cost and difficulty in order to save a few bricks seems over the top.

We love old buildings. We feel blessed to live in a community with so many of its historic buildings not just still standing, but an important part of our community identity. But old industrial buildings are not the same as old office buildings or apartment complexes that just need to be remodeled. More important now is that the redevelopment not get bogged down in expensive details that will halt the whole project.

We are entering an important time, where the details going forward can lead to quick, meaningful redevelopment, or years of in-fighting and complaints. Western Washington University and port officials are just about to announce their partnership to help raise development funding for Western's planned campus on the site. Mayor Dan Pike is working hard to forward a plan for a new central library and parking garage. We imagine developers are starting to consider pieces of the property they can acquire to advance development.

We hope our community, and its citizens, are ready to push ahead and not get too caught up in saving an old building here or there. Change on the waterfront is coming, and its arrival gets closer every day. We look forward to the economic, educational and recreational opportunities those changes will create.


SITE MAP
Home Page
  • RSS Feeds
  • Mobile Edition
  • Newsletter
  • Subscriber Services
  • Place an Ad
  • Archives
  • Local Search
  • Contact Us
News
  • Local News
  • Business
  • On Patrol
  • Northwest
  • Nation & World
  • Blogs
  • Traffic cams
Sports
  • High Schools
  • Local Colleges
  • NFL
  • MLB
  • NHL
  • NBA
  • Motorsports
Opinion
  • Letters to the editor
  • Submit a letter
Entertainment
  • Movies
  • Dining
  • GoBham
  • Horoscopes
  • Sudoku
Community
  • Announcements
  • Calendar
  • Q&A
  • NewsGarden
  • Pets
  • History
  • Web cam
Special Sections
  • Eco
  • Homebuyers Guide
  • Ski to Sea
  • Primetime
  • Whatcom Weddings
  • Whatcom Magazine
  • Neighbors
Classifieds
  • Homes
  • Jobs
  • Wheels
  • Obituaries
  • Relocation Guide
  • Place an ad
  • Search newspaper ads
Report comment as: (required) X
Remarks: (optional)
The Bellingham Herald
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • About
  • About the McClatchy Company