Calls for review of death penalty

COURTESY TO THE BELLINGHAM HERALDMay 11, 2014 

This week there was great consternation in the land over a botched execution by the state of Oklahoma. The prisoner, Clayton Lockett, apparently suffered great discomfort and pain before succumbing to a heart failure. Much was written about the unknown components of the lethal cocktail used by the state to kill the prisoner and the need for a new and more reliable mix. Even President Obama, stating that he was greatly disturbed, got involved and ordered attorney general Eric Holder to review how the death penalty is applied in the United States.

It seems strange to me that a relatively short period of suffering by one inmate should move the president to review the means we use to kill convicts without any review of the killings themselves. At a time when most of the civilized world and six of our states have abolished the death penalty because it has not been shown to deter crime, is unfairly applied in a racially disproportionate way and has resulted in the deaths of innocent victims, the president's review should be expanded to include the constitutionality of those laws that permit these state-sanctioned killings.

Chuck McGroddy

Bellingham

Bellingham Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service