Iran, 6 world powers meet; aim is to reach long-term nuclear deal by late July

ReutersMarch 18, 2014 

  • At Issue


    - Western powers have in effect abandoned idea that Iran must halt all its enrichment of uranium, which they fear may be aimed at developing atomic bombs, but want it curbed.

    - Iran says it refines uranium to fuel nuclear power plants, rules out closing Natanz and Fordow enrichment facilities.

    - It now has nearly 10,000 centrifuges spinning at supersonic speed to increase the ratio of the fissile isotope.

    - Number should be cut to low thousands – Western experts

    - United States and allies want to deny Iran any capability to quickly dash for a nuclear bomb.


    - Iran is developing new centrifuge models at Natanz.

    - Modern machines could enrich uranium faster.

    - Iran says it has right to technology for civilian use.

    - Interim accord allows Iran to continue existing R&D.

    - But powers will likely seek strict limits on R&D.


    - West fears planned heavy water research reactor could yield plutonium, potential bomb fuel.

    - Iran says Arak designed to produce medical isotopes.

    - Western experts say the reactor could be changed to ease bomb fears, for example by reducing power or changing fuel.

    - Iran has suggested it could modify plant; no details.


    - U.N. nuclear watchdog investigating suspicions Iran may have researched how to build an atomic bomb. Tehran denies it.

    - Western officials say Iran must address allegations as part of settlement of broader dispute. But unclear exactly how.


    - Iran wants punitive measures lifted quickly.

    - But powers likely to do so only gradually under any deal.

    (Reporting by Fredrik Dahl, Justyna Pawlak, Parisa Hafezi and Louis Charbonneau; editing by Ralph Boulton)

— Iran and six world powers sought on Tuesday to make headway toward resolving their decade-old nuclear dispute, with Western officials expressing hope the talks would not be further complicated by the Ukraine crisis.

So far, diplomats said, there is little sign that the worst East-West confrontation since the Cold War would undermine the quest for a deal over Iran’s atomic activity and avert the threat of a Middle East war.

The March 18-19 meeting between Iran and the powers – the United States, Russia, China, France, Britain and Germany - began a day after Washington and the European Union imposed sanctions on Russian officials over Moscow’s takeover of Ukraine’s Crimea region.

“I haven’t seen any negative effect,” Michael Mann, a spokesman for EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton who coordinates the talks on behalf of the six nations, told reporters. “We continue our work in a unified fashion.”

But that unity among the powers on Iran may still be tested in the gathering of their chief negotiators on the issue in the Austrian capital Vienna, with the four Western states and Russia at loggerheads over the future of Ukraine.

Russia and the West have in the past differed on how best to deal with Iran, with Moscow generally enjoying warmer ties with the Islamic Republic and suggesting Western fears about any nuclear weapons designs by Tehran are overblown.

As in previous meetings, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov represented Russia at the talks, which were expected to end late on Wednesday.

Despite a concerted push to end the decade-old nuclear dispute after a relative moderate, Hassan Rouhani, was elected president last year on a platform to end Iran’s international isolation, big power divisions have re-emerged.

Sources familiar with the matter told Reuters earlier this year that Moscow and Tehran were negotiating a $1.5 billion per month oil-for-goods swap that would enable Iran to lift oil export substantially in defiance of U.S. sanctions.

Between 2006 and 2010, Russia and China only reluctantly supported four rounds of U.N. sanctions against Iran over its nuclear activity, and condemned subsequent U.S. and European sanctions targeting the OPEC producer’s lifeline oil exports.

Tensions may have surfaced elsewhere in Vienna, with Iranian media saying Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif had cancelled a customary pre-talks dinner with Ashton on Monday evening.

The official IRNA news agency attributed the cancellation to Ashton’s “undiplomatic” behaviour, an apparent reference to her meeting Iranian human rights activists during her first visit to Tehran 10 days ago.


Iran has long denied accusations from Western powers and Israel that it has sought to develop the capability to produce atomic weapons under the cover of its declared civilian nuclear energy programme.

In November, Iran and the six powers struck an interim deal under which Tehran has since shelved higher-grade uranium enrichment – a potential path to atomic bombs – and obtained modest relief from punitive sanctions in return.

That pact was designed to buy time for hammering out a final settlement by a July deadline, under which the West wants Iran to significantly scale back its nuclear programme to deny it the capability to devise a nuclear weapon any time soon.

Zarif, who leads Tehran’s delegation, said he expected a trickier round of talks this week than the previous meeting in February as the two sides try to overcome stumbling blocks such as Iran’s Arak heavy water reactor and levels of uranium enrichment.

“Today enrichment was the main subject and tomorrow Arak will be discussed,” a member of the Iranian delegation said.

A Western diplomat said no deals on any individual issues were expected to be reached at the Vienna round, saying that “nothing is agreed until everything is agreed”.

Another added that any discussions on Arak, which the West fears could provide Iran with an alternative route to obtaining bomb material, or the extent of uranium enrichment, took place against the backdrop of Iranian demands over sanctions relief.

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has granted the Iranian nuclear team “carte blanche” to provide guarantees to the West that the country’s nuclear programme is peaceful, said a senior Iranian official who asked not to be named.

“But the red line is closure of any nuclear site and stopping enrichment,” the official said. “The talks are becoming more and more difficult because hardliners in Iran are watching any outcome very closely.”

He was alluding to powerful conservatives in the Islamic Republic’s security and clerical establishments deeply suspicious of Rouhani’s diplomatic opening to the West.

In an opinion piece published in the Financial Times, Zarif said Iran was serious about striking a deal but urged the six powers to step up their efforts towards an agreement – in an apparent swipe at hawks in Washington.

“Our counterparts will have to make tough choices. They will have to back up rhetoric with action,” he wrote. “Some of them will have to spend copious amounts of political capital to remain credible before the international community. Others, who have grown comfortable with the status quo, will have to scramble to reposition themselves.”

In Washington, a bipartisan group of 83 U.S. senators – a vast majority of the U.S. legislature’s 100-member upper house - wrote to President Barack Obama on Tuesday, outlining necessary “core principles” for a final agreement with Tehran.

The letter says Iran should abandon the Arak reactor and its Fordow enrichment plant, though it does not mention the much larger underground uranium enrichment facility at Natanz.

The senators also say Iran should not be allowed to circumvent sanctions during the negotiations and urges the administration to deal with sanctions violators harshly.

“We must signal unequivocally to Iran that rejecting negotiations and continuing its nuclear weapon programme will lead to much more dramatic sanctions, including further limitations on Iran’s exports of crude oil and petroleum products,” the senators told Obama.

Additional reporting by Parisa Hafezi and Fredrik Dahl in Vienna; Editing by Mark Heinrich

Bellingham Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service