Suggests reasons for bay life decline


I was surprised when I read in the article about Bellingham Bay that they thought that increased pollution was responsible for the decline in invertebrates at the bottom of Bellingham Bay. Certainly over the last 10 to 20 years there has been a decline in pollution going into Bellingham Bay with our industries leaving town. What I believe was totally forgotten in this report is that bottom dwelling organisms rely on food falling out of the water column and coming down to feed them. We have a large food web in the bay and it is all reliant on the primary producers, which are the algae. Algae require nutrients to live. The logging industry has been reduced and there is less erosion in our hills, which means less nutrients for the algae. The dairy industry has been required to contain their manure and keep it from washing into the river, which means there are less nutrients for the algae. Phosphorus has been removed from our fertilizers and hence less of it washes into the streams, which means less nutrients for the algae. The fact that we have fewer invertebrates on the bottom of Bellingham Bay probably proves that these measures to control "pollution" from entering the bay have been effective! Hurray! If they are finding more "toxins" it could be that there is not as much sediment coming down the river to cover it up.

Wayne Youngquist


Bellingham Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service