Still wants change to food labels


I believe Washington voters have spoken on I-522: "We don't really care what we put in our mouths." Why? If you believed the ads, we were going to see a big increase in food prices. Really? No one ever said how much, or why, prices would increase. Two studies from big agribusiness prior to California's vote on genetically modified organisms last year claimed that food producers would be forced to start using non-GM or organic foods to avoid having to put labels on foods that might scare people, thereby making food more expensive. Food would cost more not because changing labels is expensive -- it isn't, food manufacturers do it all the time -- but because the companies would substitute more expensive, non-GMO ingredients. But any first-year economics student knows that when you create demand in any market, the prices of those commodities eventually go down. Aside from the GMOs are unsafe vs. GMOs are safe argument, more important is that consumers need access to information in order to make informed decisions regarding which agricultural practices they want to support with their buying decisions. I, for one, would support more sustainable practices. Personally, I don't mind if farmers modify plants like they've been doing for centuries. But if some scientist wants to put a bovine gene into a tomato, I want to know about it. I feel this issue is not settled. Label food and let the people decide.

Kevin Leja


Bellingham Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service