Rant: Why did the city destroy lawn at Boulevard Park?


Regarding the Oct. 19 photo on Boulevard Park, this work is not a restoration or a return to a natural state. Boulevard Park is almost totally built on fill, so there was no natural land in the area being worked on to be "restored."

Since restoration could not have been the objective, why was a large part of the lawn area destroyed? Don't tell me about erosion. Surely the large pieces of concrete that lined the shore before were adequately resistant to erosion, more so than the sand, gravel and small stones that have replaced them.

- Denis Hayner of Bellingham, via Letters to the Editor

Rants and Raves appear Mondays in The Bellingham Herald. Email your rant or rave to letters@bellinghamherald.com. Comments will be edited for space and become the property of The Bellingham Herald.

Bellingham Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service