Unhappy with coal terminal plan


In Gateway Pacific Terminal's "Report to the Community" last week we see an example of the "hollywoodization" of the Gateway Pacific Terminal, I believe seducing the public and omitting important truths.

The facility is advertised as a "state-of-the-art" multi-use terminal, rather than a coal terminal for the first 10 years or more. The word coal is only mentioned once. Goldman-Sachs is financing the largest coal shipping terminal in North America and Peabody Energy, the largest coal company in the world, I believe is endorsing this project to shore up profits in the U.S. market. No amount of money or photos of polished, new equipment in an antiseptically clean terminal changes the fact that coal is a dirty, dangerous business creating toxic environments. We are given the illusion that no one will see or touch a speck of coal. Not one photo shows the uncovered coal trains, traveling 1,000-plus miles from Montana through Bellingham to Ferndale, nor the 80-acre stockyard of half-mile-long, 60-feet-high coal piles uncovered in open air 24/7.

To see beyond this façade, read page 4-53 of the permit application/project information document, submitted in March 2012 by Gateway Pacific Terminal: "It is anticipated that in the first 10 years, the terminal would likely manage exports of low-sulfur, low ash coal, Canadian potash, and locally produced calcined petroleum coke."

Harold Roper


Bellingham Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service