Unhappy with 'lobbyist perks'


Does the news about Doug Ericksen's lobbyist perks surprise anyone?

I believe ethics are of secondary concern to our special-interest specialist whose dismal record as a people's representative is on record.

Big interest, big business.... people get lost while he collects his lobbyist perks. No matter voters pay him $90 per day for food and various costs his "ethics" allow him to double dip while he purports to be acting for constituents. No so-called representative so inevitably and blatantly moves on behalf of big business.

Inadequate space prevents details so just retrace his record, it will noticeably be choked with hardline pro-business positions. I believe voters are low men on his totem pole.

May I propose a logo "Who pays the piper calls the tune?" Voters get lost, your $90 per day contribution is peanuts to Mr. Ericksen whom I believe probably prefers the possibility of a feathered nest to be readied by his business friends when his political days end.

Doug Lomas


Bellingham Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service