Critical of county's vote on economic-development funds


It has been interesting, but disheartening, to see how the Whatcom County Council has managed the county's Economic Development Investment fund. The fund accrues about $3.2 million each year from the entire county, and last year the council voted to spend $6 million of the EDI funds to help one city, Lynden, expand its sewage treatment plant.

Lynden contributes less than 10 percent of the county's EDI funds, yet received nearly two full years' worth of its revenue. The plant will enable Lynden to consume more water, but even its current water rights are dubious. And farmers with their own uncertain water rights should be wary of Lynden's growing demands - and of the impact Lynden's growth could have on adjacent farmlands. After all, the county is supposed to protect those farmlands, not encourage urban encroachment into them.

The Lynden project was promoted as a jobs creator, but it looks more like favoritism for one small city at the expense of the entire rest of the county. And where is the "economic development?" I understand Everson has shown interest in going after some of that easy county EDI money for itself.

Who voted for the EDI fund's splurge on the Lynden expansion project? Kathy Kershner and Bill Knutzen, among others. Who opposed it? Only Ken Mann and Carl Weimer, and they should be commended for defending the entire county's interests.

Ken Kaliher


Bellingham Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service