I-1185 voters: Don’t also expect more state services

The News TribuneSeptember 14, 2012 

If recent history is any guide, Washingtonians in November will elect a slew of liberal Democrats to the Legislature, most with hopes of spending more on education, health care and social services.

At the same time, voters will enact a measure – Initiative 1185 – that will effectively prevent those Democrats from raising more revenue to pay for those hopes. I-1185 would require a two-thirds majority in the Legislature for new taxes unless they are approved by a vote of the people.

Welcome to Washington, where a big schizoid chunk of the electorate seems to want a generous state government – without spending another nickel on it.

For the record, we’ll recite our customary objections to supermajority requirements.

Washington has a representative system of government. Lawmakers are supposed to make policy decisions on a democratic basis; if voters don’t like the decisions, they are free to remove the lawmakers come election day.

A two-thirds majority requirement is inherently undemocratic. It effectively gives opponents of a tax proposal twice the voting power as its supporters. The citizens behind the opposition get twice the political power as those who favor the tax.

Obviously, we oppose I-1185 – not that we expect it to fail.

In an electorate less conflicted than Washington’s, anti-tax forces wouldn’t need initiatives; they’d simply elect a majority of like-minded lawmakers. Here, though, many anti-taxers vote for Democrats – while also voting to keep them barking in the yard on chain leashes.

Tim Eyman takes this political conundrum to the bank.

Eyman makes his living ginning up initiatives, including I-1185. He and his partners sponsored the last two of the four supermajority initiatives Washingtonians have passed since 1993.

He notes out that the Legislature – those tax-loving Democrats! – can easily revise or repeal an initiative two years after its passage. Hence the urgency of recycling the measure on a regular basis.

We’d complain, except that the perpetual supermajority project keeps Eyman away from another of his perennial causes – trying to micromanage Washington’s highways with initiatives that target congestion-relief measures. Fortunately for drivers, he tends to lose those campaigns.

This year, I-1185 again promises no new taxes. And some brave candidates are saying the state must spend $1 billion more on public schools and on Medicaid and on the environment, etc.

Plenty of voters will buy both pitches.

 • To read previous election endorsement editorials, go to www.thenewstribune.com/ endorsements.

Bellingham Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service