The Bellingham Herald sent questionnaires to candidates for major offices in the November 2011 general election. Candidates answered the following questions in their own words.
These are unedited; candidates were limited to 300 words per question.
For quick links to each candidate's responses, click on their names below:
District 1, Pos. B
District 2, Pos. B
District 3, Pos. B
The election is Nov. 8. If you are not registered to vote in Washington, you can register in person at the Whatcom County Auditor's Office until Monday, Oct. 31.
If you are registered to vote but miss the deadline to update your address, you can still vote. Contact the county elections office where you are currently registered in order to obtain a ballot.
Elected office you seek: Whatcom County Council, District 1, Position B
Age: 59
Family: wife Fidela Kremen
Education: Highline High School, Seattle, class of 1970; Whatcom Community College, 1975; Harvard University JFK School of Government, crisis management, 2002.
Work experience: 1996-present Whatcom County executive, County Executives of America Board of Directors, NW Regional Council Board of Directors, Council of Governments Board of Directors; 1985-1996 Washington State House of Representatives / 42nd Legislative District; 1977-1984 director of news and public affairs, KPUG/KNWR Bellingham; 1974-1977 director of news and public affairs, KBFW Bellingham.
Civic experience: Present member Boys and Girls Club of Whatcom County board, NW Economic Council board, Bellingham/Whatcom Tourism board, Whatcom North Rotary Club, Assistance League of Bellingham advisory board, American Museum of Radio and Electricity board, Nooksack Salmon Enhancement Association, Whatcom Farm Friends, Humane Society, Rome Grange, Sons of the American Legion. Past member United Way of Whatcom County, Bellingham/Whatcom Chamber of Commerce board, Big Brothers/Big Sisters of NW WA, Boy Scouts of America-Mount Baker Council, St. Joseph Medical Center Community Council, Whatcom Opportunity Council board, Mount Baker Theatre board, Whatcom Symphony Orchestra board, Bellingham Festival of Music board, Sean Humphrey House board, Evergreen Aids Foundation board, Navy League of Bellingham.
Major endorsements (limit 10): Personal endorsements from almost every mayor, police chief and Chamber of Commerce leader in Whatcom County; Prosecutor David McEachran; Local 2379 (Alcoa/Intalco); Teamsters; Hart Hodges, director, Center for Economic & Business Research at WWU; Whatcom County Democratic Central Committee.
Campaign website: petekremen.com
Email: pkremen@comcast.net
Facebook page: Facebook.com/petekremenforcountycouncil
Q and A
Candidates answered the following questions in their own words. These are unedited; candidates were limited to 300 words per questions.
What are your views on the proposed coal and bulk cargo terminal at Cherry Point and the train traffic that would be associated with it?
I do have concerns regarding the proposed terminal's impacts on our community, especially the number and length of trains rolling through our county. However, the potential for high-wage jobs and associated employment as well as revenue benefits to our economy could be significant. I believe the gauntlet of environmental scrutiny by the EPA, DOE, DNR, DF&W, Army Corps of Engineers and Whatcom County should fully vet the impacts to our community. If it's determined that whatever impacts there may be will be successfully mitigated, then I believe positive consideration for the project should be given with assurances that many high-wage jobs will be created.
Where should the new jail be located, how big should it be and how should it be paid for?
Whatcom County definitely needs a new 500 to 600 bed jail as soon as reasonably possible. It should be located on land that is capable of expansion if the County needs additional capacity and can afford to build and operate a larger facility. That objective precludes locating the new correctional facility in the downtown area because of the inability to economically or practically expand, in the event, that increased capacity is deemed necessary. In addition to allowing for future expansion, the new jail site ideally should be located near I-5 for accessibility to all of the jurisdictions within the county along with water and sewer availability. Potential expansion may accommodate the development of alternatives to incarceration and treatment, as appropriate.
The County should construct a right size jail within the next four years. Sheriff Elfo projects no additional operating costs due to the efficiency of consolidation to a single new facility. It is projected that the new jail can be paid for by using existing reserves, future funds from existing revenue sources in addition to the proceeds realized from liquidating our valuable light industrial property on Division Street. No new taxes will be required for this imperative project.
I've appointed a Jail Task Force comprised of law enforcement, corrections, judicial and community members. Their recommendations will help the County to build the right-size jail.
What can Whatcom County do to bring more jobs to the area?
My top priority is to focus on preserving and creating family-wage jobs. We must help our existing businesses thrive and attract new businesses and industries that are consistent with Whatcom County values. On this issue, I'm proud of my record. Here are three examples:
1. I modified additional funding of the Economic Development Investment program. These funds, which otherwise would go to the state, will be targeted toward building local public infrastructure, creating family-wage jobs. This program will also create high-wage jobs for the private sector. My plan is supported universally by local governments and the County Council.
2. As county executive, I worked with management and union leadership at Alcoa/Intalco Works to keep the Cherry Point aluminum smelter operating through challenging times. We worked with the Bonneville Power Administration and our congressional delegation to ensure that the plant has access to affordable power. As a result, the plant, which was on the brink of having to close and forced to slash its workforce to 425, now employs 632 workers.
3. I've worked with officials of BP to expedite the permitting necessary for a $400 million expansion at the company's Cherry Point refinery to generate more high-wage jobs.
Because I'm able to work with both business and labor, I have support from both. I have the endorsement s of the IAMAW (Intalco) and Teamsters, as well as personal endorsements from the leaders of the Bellingham/Whatcom, Blaine, Birch Bay, Ferndale, Mt.Baker-Foothills, Everson-Nooksack and Lynden Chambers of Commerce.
Should the county, in its next budget, take whatever steps necessary to halt the draining of general fund reserves? If so, how?
Whatcom County has taken the steps necessary to meet the challenges posed by the Great Recession. We are the only county in Washington that has not raised the county's share of the property taxes for the past 16 years. The County's budget is now balanced. Additionally, the County will be debt free after making its last bond payments in April of 2012. Whatcom County will need to continue to maintain a prudent fund balance reserve well into the future without raising taxes. We can accomplish this goal by carefully pinpointing our priorities and working closely with our elected officials, department heads, managers, and employees to hold the line against new spending proposals. Finding innovative ways to provide the services that businesses and residents need and expect will be a continuing priority.
When do you believe, if ever, tax or fee increases are appropriate? Would they be on the table if you were elected?
I am not in favor of raising taxes. Tax increases will not be "on the table" if I am elected. Whatcom County is unique in not having raised property taxes in the last 16 years. Any tax increase, if it was to be considered, should be subject to these three tests:
1. The County has a significant and compelling problem that is universally recognized.
2. The solution would be direct, cost-effective and supported by a vast majority o elected officials.
3. If these two conditions are met then there must be a vote of the people.
The people of Whatcom County should be the ones to authorize any increase in taxes.
Do you support shifting property tax authority from dedicated funds, like the road fund, to the general fund?
All funds collected by the County are the people's money. I am in favor of giving maximum flexibility to our local elected officials to use the public's resources on the highest priority issues without raising taxes. This flexibility is what the voters have approved time and time again with the adoption of our "Home Rule Charter". Most counties in the state are transferring road funds to the general fund. I am not in favor of that approach since the road fund is only paid by taxpayers in the unincorporated area while the General Fund supports services for all residents - rural and urban.
Have public employees made enough concessions in these tough economic times?
Last year during our budget process - with many painful, but necessary cuts and changes - we reset our General Fund budget to a level we can responsibly sustain for 2011 and 2012. We crafted a balanced budget for the next two years that retains critical services and positions us for a fiscally sound future. Our county elected officials and department heads led the way by making tough budget cuts and freezing their own salaries and those of unrepresented employees who work with them. But we could not have succeeded in crafting the budget as we did without the cooperation of our valued employees, and the unions that represent them. We worked cooperatively with labor representatives to negotiate ways to address the gap between revenues and spending. This collaboration reflects the longstanding mutual respect of my administration and our workers. I salute all the employees who cooperated with us during these difficult times. Many other public officials in other counties have taken a different approach, often making public employees the enemy. I firmly believe to follow that path would fail to honor the hard work our employees perform in service to the public each and every day. Our county employees' spirit of sacrifice sent a powerful signal about their commitment to serving the public. For that, I am truly thankful.
Do you support the transfer of nearly 9,000 acres in the Lake Whatcom watershed to county control for use as parkland? Why or why not?
Yes. I believe the creation of a Lake Whatcom Forest Preserve would be extremely beneficial to the overall quality and protection of the watershed for posterity. To acquire approximately 8,700 acres within the watershed for less than $300,000 would be the "purchase of a lifetime". I also believe the transfer would be the single most effective measure ever taken to protect the public's water supply for half of the residents of Whatcom County while providing extremely low impact recreational opportunities consistent with our community's values.
What should Whatcom County do, if anything, to halt the growth and planning lawsuits between Bellingham and the county?
The County has not sued the City for any planning or growth issue. It is "the City" that has pursued litigation rather than collaboration. I do not feel that this serves the public good. It only costs taxpayers' dollars and lengthens the timelines for achievement of some imperative goals. In terms of GMA compliance, the record shows that the County's Planning and Development Services Department has held seven meetings with every city in Whatcom County. Bellingham and County staffs continue to work together on growth and planning issues in addition to water quality matters. The County works well with all the cities of our county. It is only the City of Bellingham who has chosen to resolve conflict by unheralded lawsuits rather than communicating, cooperating and working together to come to terms when there is disagreement.
When a downzone isn't required by law or board/court order, do you believe it's ever appropriate to downzone land without compensating the landowner? If so, when?
No.
Other than the above, what are the most important issues facing Whatcom County and how would you address them?
Our main focus needs to be retaining and generating high-paying jobs in our local economy.
Other issues that are of major importance are:
• Support public safety and crime prevention efforts.
• Protection of our environment and cherished quality of life through preservation of farmland and helping farmers, preventing "urban sprawl" and protection of our essential and precious water bodies.
• County government needs to continue to require accountability and transparency, which includes an engrained culture of customer service and accessibility.
Elected office you seek: Whatcom County Council, District 1, Position B
Age: 48
Family: wife Danielle; two children, Bronte, 14, Jonathan, 12.
Education: degree in economics and finance from Western Washington University
Work experience: owner of Northwest Business Monthly magazine; former owner of Bellingham Bells Baseball Club.
Civic experience: Have held and currently hold leadership positions on numerous local boards including Northwest Economic Council, Bellingham/Whatcom Chamber of Commerce, Opportunity Council, Junior Achievement, Western Washington University Alumni Association, Northwest Private Industry Council and many more.
Major endorsements (limit 10): Northwest Farm Bureau, Cattleman's Association, Sheriff's Guild, Whatcom Realtor's Association, Small Town Mayors, Building Industry Association.
Campaign website: getwhatcomworking.com
Email: votetony@getwhatcomworking.com
Facebook page: Get Whatcom Working
Q and A
Candidates answered the following questions in their own words. These are unedited; candidates were limited to 300 words per questions.
What are your views on the proposed coal and bulk cargo terminal at Cherry Point and the train traffic that would be associated with it?
We need to do everything we can to promote the creation of good paying jobs in our community. We also need to make sure we are protecting the interests of our community as it relates to negative or potentially negative impacts. As of June 10, 2011 when SSA Marine filed their permit with the County, all council members became quasi-judicial, meaning the council will be required to rule on this application in the future.
Sitting council members have been admonished by the prosecutors office not to gather information, discuss the issue with the parties, participate in, or attend functions where discussions regarding this project are being talked about in specific terms. In general terms, I believe it is important to give every project a fair and thoughtful hearing. I believe we should pay particular attention to projects of this magnitude that will have significant impact on our community. Anytime a company comes forward with a proposal that would invest $500 million into the local economy and create a couple thousand union wage construction jobs over the construction phase of a project and a few hundred high wage permanent union jobs thereafter, at a time when our construction industry is facing over 30 percent unemployment, we need to take it very seriously. We also need to make sure we are clear on the impacts to our community and make sure we are prepared to negotiate mitigation strategies if necessary. As your Councilman, I will weigh all the information available and balance the costs and benefits and make a decision that makes sense.
Where should the new jail be located, how big should it be and how should it be paid for?
Most agree a new jail MUST be built. In 2004 voters were sold on a tax increase specifically for that purpose. Since then, the jail fund has generated nearly $20 million, yet we still don't have a new jail. Instead, we've wasted $1 million on consultants who produced a study that doesn't make sense, in a process that completely lacked transparency. Now the jail fund is nearly depleted. In July of 2011, the County approved an additional $3.1 million as a band-aid on the old, dilapidated jail just to keep it safe and secure. Eight years, lots of wasted resources and zero results. Now we're studying the issue some more. Leadership in the Executive office and support on the County Council will be required to get this project moving in the right direction. There are numerous companies experienced in building state of the art jails who can be used as a resource. The Sheriff has made site visits to many of these facilities. We should model the best modern facilities that incorporate design and technology features that maximize safety, security and operational efficiencies and will reduce operating costs in the long-term. New designs also allow for future expansion, a feature lacking in the current jail. After we agree on the number of beds required in the initial design and estimate the potential need in the future, contractors can tell us exactly what size land footprint is required. Local commercial real estate professionals can provide all feasible locations that would meet our objectives. This process shouldn't require expensive consultants, it requires leadership.
To fund the jail we should look at existing capital funds, reallocating our debt service on the courthouse that ends in 2012, our bonding capacity, cuts in other areas and perhaps sale proceeds from the temporary facility.
What can Whatcom County do to bring more jobs to the area?
We need to not only bring new jobs to our community, we need to protect existing jobs as well. Our economy is the key driver of our quality of life and our local businesses are the key driver of our economy. We must support and encourage these job creators and make sure our policies are not stifling their success. For example, we must support our $300-$400 million local farming industry by eliminating unnecessary regulatory burdens and solving their water problems. We must create a mechanism to consistently expedite permits for company's expanding and creating jobs. BP Cherry Point Refinery recently broke ground on the construction of their diesel hydrogen unit. This $400 million investment is now underway and will employ approximately 1500 during the two-year construction phase. The county must step in early to facilitate the permit process on projects like these. To encourage new employment, we must reverse our reputation of being a difficult place to conduct business. That requires a change in culture from a government trying to stop projects to a government standing ready to assist in any way it can. This requires leadership from the top and support from the council. I have made that my top priority and will continue to do so if re-elected. Economic development partners must work collaboratively and speak with one voice. The Northwest Economic Council is in the process of restructuring to do just that. They are partnering with the Port of Bellingham, WWU, Whatcom County, The City of Bellingham and a number of other organizations to refocus on the changing needs in our community. As a board member of the NWEC and as publisher of Northwest Business Monthly Magazine I have been and will continue to be a strong advocate for job creators in our community.
Should the county, in its next budget, take whatever steps necessary to halt the draining of general fund reserves? If so, how?
I am committed to bringing my experience and leadership to this issue on County Council. I didn't support the current budget because these problems were ignored. They were kicked down the road to a future administration. We can't afford to wait for the next budget cycle. We need to take action now. The county is facing a $6.4 million shortfall in the current general fund budget and that number is projected to grow in the next cycle.
Just as many families and businesses in our community have had to learn to do more with less, local government has to eliminate wasteful spending and find creative ways to provide core government services at a lower cost. I've been on the Whatcom County Council for less than a year. In that time I've been relentlessly identifying, speaking out about and voting against unnecessary and wasteful spending and will continue to do so. Also, the need to grapple with these difficult decisions must send the message that we need to review regulations that stifle jobs and draw attention to the need to work harder to create a business-friendly environment where companies can prosper, pay taxes and pay living wages. I have a degree in economics and finance and I've owned and operated multiple businesses over the past 23 years. I've had to manage companies in both prosperous and difficult times and understand what it takes to bring fiscal discipline to an organization. As your councilman, I will use my experience, leadership skills and common sense to make a positive difference in local government.
When do you believe, if ever, tax or fee increases are appropriate? Would they be on the table if you were elected?
I would never limit the choices by taking any option off the table. However, I think it would be irresponsible to consider raising taxes and fees on families and businesses in this environment. First and foremost, we need to eliminate wasteful spending. I've been working on that relentlessly since elected last year and will continue to do so if re-elected. Many elected officials falsely believe that raising taxes on families and businesses is the only way to solve our budget problems. I completely disagree. We don't need to raise taxes; we need to increase tax revenues. They may sound similar, but there is a big difference between the two. In 13 of the past 16 years, our economy was booming. Property values were rising and sales tax receipts were growing. Revenues to the county were increasing robustly. The problem is that county spending was allowed to grow at a faster rate. That's why we were forced to use our reserves even before the economic downturn began.
As revenues trended downward, our reserves have been siphoned at a faster rate. Our reserves would be completely depleted now if we didn't practice the regular policy of transferring money from other funds to patch up holes in the general fund. When we create a positive business climate, our economy is healthier, businesses do better, more people make purchases and more tax revenues are collected by our local governments. That's why we must do everything we can to support and encourage our small businesses and major employers and make sure we are not stifling their productivity with unnecessary costs and regulations. Fostering a robust economy is the only real way to protect both public and private sector jobs and will be an area I will continue to champion as your Whatcom County Councilman.
Do you support shifting property tax authority from dedicated funds, like the road fund, to the general fund?
It's a practice that has been common for many years and needs to stop. We need to develop the financial discipline to manage our funds without robbing from Peter to pay Paul. On my first night on the Whatcom County Council in November of 2010, the County Executive proposed we transfer money from the conservation futures fund to patch up shortfalls in the general fund. I was the swing vote and voted no to stop it. Voters supported the creation of that dedicated fund by 57 percent as a way to preserve and protect our environment. Dedicated funds should be used for the purpose they were set up for. Money has also been transferred out of the jail fund that was supposed to be used to build a new jail. Now we don't have a new jail or the money to build it. I'm on the council finance committee and since I've arrived, I've brought fiscal discipline and a fresh perspective to how we operate county government. I question every spending proposal on behalf of Whatcom County taxpayers to make sure there is not a more efficient or effective way to proceed and to make sure we are not being wasteful. Just like families are having to do more with less, so does county government. As your councilman, I will continue to be a watchdog for taxpayers and bring new, specific ideas regarding how we can reverse this alarming trend.
Have public employees made enough concessions in these tough economic times?
We have many outstanding, hardworking employees working for Whatcom County who have already experienced layoffs, pay freezes and have been forced to take furlough days. The administration has implemented mandatory closure days on which the community has no access to government services in order to deal with current budget challenges. Yet, we are still looking at a $6.4 million shortfall in the current general fund budget. Employee payroll and benefits make up approximately 70 percent of the general fund budget and that percentage continues to grow from year to year. It is regretful, but we will likely need to look at additional concessions from Whatcom County employees.
Asking hardworking rank and file employees for additional concessions is made more difficult by a County Executive who does not lead by example. He fought tooth and nail against my request to eliminate premium pay for himself and the other 26 highest paid county elected officials and staff. My proposal did not touch their average $113,000 per year salary or benefits. It only impacted their premium pay that was authorized through Executive Order in 2004 to reimburse selected elected officials and staff for potential overtime and other expenses. The cost of this program to the county ranges between $175,000-$200,000 per year. Elected and top county salaried officials should not be paid for overtime or wireless internet at their home. My proposal would have eliminated all premium pay for elected officials and would have provided transparency and accountability for dealing with reasonable reimbursable expenses for staff. Hours after I introduced this ordinance, the executive repealed his own Executive Order, effective the day after he leaves office. I believe all moral authority is lost when a leader asks his employees to do something he is not willing to do himself.
Do you support the transfer of nearly 9,000 acres in the Lake Whatcom watershed to county control for use as parkland? Why or why not?
There is a $6.4 million shortfall in Whatcom County's current general fund budget. An even larger shortfall is projected for 2013-14. Most of our other funds are trending downward and we're seeing a retrenching of state and federal budgets, resulting in fewer dollars flowing into Whatcom County. The approximately 9000 acres in consideration for reconveyance is already publicly owned and managed by the State Department of Natural Resources under the strictest environmental standards. There are zero development rights on this land.
These trust lands provide jobs to the timber industry and much needed income to the Mount Baker School District, Bellingham School District and other junior taxing districts at a time when they are experiencing shrinking budgets. The trust lands have additional resource protection required by the Habitat Conservation Plan and the citizen developed Lake Whatcom Landscape Plan. DNR currently assumes all liability for fire, accidents and landslides and all other expense associated with managing these lands. The land is already available for hikers and other recreational users. If we allow this land to be reconveyed to Whatcom County at this time, it would result in eliminating much needed revenue for our schools and jobs for our timber industry. There would be no discernable environmental benefit. In fact, I would argue that without significant investment, Whatcom County could not manage it to the similar standards as DNR is currently. Whatcom County would assume all liability and costs for the property. Whatcom County would take on cost for the design, construction and ongoing maintenance of the park, not to mention the additional traffic in the Lake Whatcom watershed. We would have to consider additional Sheriff staff to patrol a new park. I believe county government needs to reset priorities and would urge my opponent to reconsider his support of this project at this time.
What should Whatcom County do, if anything, to halt the growth and planning lawsuits between Bellingham and the county?
During my short time on the County Council, it's become clear there is friction between the leadership of the County and City of Bellingham. It's not only evident as it relates to growth and planning, but also with issues like our EMS system. Bellingham is part of the County and the County seat is in Bellingham. We need to re-establish a positive working relationship. With a new County Executive and the possibility of a change in leadership in Bellingham, we are guaranteed a new dynamic. I'm hopeful it will be positive. I think the County Council needs to reach out to the Bellingham City Council on issues of mutual interest as well. Recently, I met with two City Council members to discuss the inclusion of the Yew Street area into the UGA. The meeting was productive and allowed me to get a better understanding of their thinking. We also need to meet more regularly to discuss how we can work together to improve the water quality of Lake Whatcom. The people of Whatcom County deserve knowing the county and cities have a cooperative working relationship. Filing a lawsuit should be the action of last resort. If we have substantive disagreements that can't be reconciled after fair and thoughtful debate, then let a third party decide.
When a downzone isn't required by law or board/court order, do you believe it's ever appropriate to downzone land without compensating the landowner? If so, when?
Individual property rights are protected by the United States Constitution, Washington State Constitution and by our Whatcom County Charter. One of the 13 stated goals of Washington's Growth Management Act is to protect the private property rights of it's citizens. It says private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made. It goes on to say the property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions. In our Whatcom County Charter it says no regulation or ordinance shall be drafted and adopted without consideration of and provisions for compensation to those unduly burdened. Clearly these rights are very important to us. Unfortunately, the state GMA has conflicting directives that have the force of law and we've had to make tough decisions to try to balance those directives and the rights of our citizens. In March, the County Council finalized the rural element of the Whatcom County Comprehensive Plan and submitted it to the state. This should bring us into compliance and eliminate any need for future downzones. As your councilman, I will continue to do everything I can to protect these fundamental rights.
Other than the above, what are the most important issues facing Whatcom County and how would you address them?
Lake Whatcom water quality - With resources limited and funding sources being squeezed, we need to work with the City of Bellingham and Water District to identify how best to reverse the trend in water quality and make sure we are getting the best return on our water quality investments.
Public Safety - The Sheriff department took a $900k cut in the last budget. We need to make sure they have the resources to aggressively deal with growing public safety issues, particularly the increase in gang activity we are seeing in Whatcom County.
Farming - We need to make sure we are preserving farmland, solving water rights problems, toughening right to farm laws and reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens on farmers so they can make farming economically viable.
EMS- We need to get the bickering stopped and facilitate a process with all the stakeholders to deliver emergency medical services in the most effective and cost efficient manner to all Whatcom County residents.
Elected office you seek: Whatcom County Council, District 2, Position B
Age: 35
Family: husband Nate Melanson, son Alden Melanson
Education: bachelor of science, natural resource policy, University of Massachusetts, 1998; master of science, environmental science, Western Washington University, 2006.
Work experience: 2007-present, Washington State Department of Ecology stormwater specialist, grants project manager; 2003-05, city of Bellingham Public Works intern for property acquisition and stormwater programs; 2000-02, Water Resources Research Center, statewide coordinator for Acid Rain Monitoring Program.
Civic experience: Lake Whatcom Watershed Advisory Board, Washington State University Beachwatchers/Watershed Masters, Community Emergency Response Training (CERT).
Major endorsements (limit 10): Whatcom Democrats, Washington Conservation Voters, IAFF 106 Bellingham/Whatcom Firefighters, Amalgamated Transit Union Local 843 Bellingham, Northwest Washington Central Labor Council, Sierra Club - Washington state chapter, Progressive Majority, Democracy for America - Bellingham, National Women's Political Caucus of Washington, Whatcom Democratic Women's Club.
Campaign website: christinamaginnis.com
Email: info@christinamaginnis.com
Twitter handle: waterlandsafety@twitter
Facebook page: Vote-Christina-Maginnis
Q and A
Candidates answered the following questions in their own words. These are unedited; candidates were limited to 300 words per questions.
What are your views on the proposed coal and bulk cargo terminal at Cherry Point and the train traffic that would be associated with it?
Transparency and trust are critical, and I am deeply concerned about the recent violations of SSA Marine, a privately held company planning to build a pier and bulk goods terminal at Cherry Point in order to ship 54 million tons of coal per year to China. With such a large project in the beginning stages, our community needs to know that this company will follow our local and state laws. With 18 trains potentially traveling through our County everyday, we need real solutions to increased train traffic as our waterfront is redeveloped. With promises of good jobs, we need to know how many people from Whatcom County will be hired for long term jobs created at this facility. We also need more answers on the health impacts from coal both traveling on trains, and sitting in piles at the proposed terminal. You need to trust that your County Council is informed, will listen to citizens input, and represent your values before voting on this project.
Where should the new jail be located, how big should it be and how should it be paid for?
After taking a tour of both the downtown jail and the Division Street work center, Whatcom County needs a new jail. We need one that is the right size for our community. I think we could build a jail of around 600 beds close to the court system to serve our community. We have a jail task force of citizens making recommendations to the County Council in January and I will be listening to their recommendations as well as weighing the costs. We can expand the Division street work center as a short term place for 50 more inmates. We need to expand alternative sentencing programs like daily check in or more work crews, so we aren't sending people to jail who can continue to be productive members of our community. We need better mental health and substance abuse programs for people who would be able to find treatment without being put in jail. Our community can pay for these options within the current jail fund. Given the cost of a new facility, building a new jail will need to go to the voters for more funding to be approved.
What can Whatcom County do to bring more jobs to the area?
We need good jobs at all skill levels. This is one of the best places to live in the world if you have a good job. I will work to see Whatcom County become a leader in clean energy technology and job creation. I support a plan to bring in more medium sized businesses with stable jobs, to Whatcom County and use our economic development fund dollars to help grow businesses already here. I'll work with our colleges to kick-start training programs for a green job workforce here in our community. I'll help increase jobs in farming by supporting training for new farmers and loans to buy farmland and development rights.
Should the county, in its next budget, take whatever steps necessary to halt the draining of general fund reserves? If so, how?
The County must be able to balance the budget without spending down our general fund reserves. We need to look at many options including increasing efficiencies within designated funds and streamlining services so we reduce redundancy.
When do you believe, if ever, tax or fee increases are appropriate? Would they be on the table if you were elected?
When the community supports paying for a service then we need to fund that service. We need to leave all options open in order to maintain the level of critical services to serve our diverse County population.
Do you support shifting property tax authority from dedicated funds, like the road fund, to the general fund?
If dedicated funds are not utilized to their capacity, and we have shortfalls in other areas of critical services, we should be able to consider using our limited tax dollars to pay for the most critical services.
Have public employees made enough concessions in these tough economic times?
Yes I believe that public sector employees have made sacrifices in salaries, took days without pay, paid increased benefit costs and faced increasing workloads as other staff jobs were cut from budgets or people retired. While all of us are feeling the recession, we need to support our public sector employees as they provide much needed services to many people in our community.
Do you support the transfer of nearly 9,000 acres in the Lake Whatcom watershed to county control for use as parkland? Why or why not?
Yes. Protecting almost 9000 acres from logging in a drinking water supply is a high priority. For such a minimal cost to transfer the County trust lands back to local control, it is a clear win for County residents. We will not only create a legacy old growth park, and remove 9 miles of poorly constructed logging roads, but also eliminate another 20 miles of NEW roads from being constructed. Fewer roads will eliminate continued erosion, and sediment going into Lake Whatcom. With so much time and work invested in planning for this reconveyance, we need to close the deal with DNR and celebrate a win-win for parks and our drinking water supply.
What should Whatcom County do, if anything, to halt the growth and planning lawsuits between Bellingham and the county?
I support the County following the state land use laws. That is their job as County Council members - to uphold local and state laws. With several recent court cases before the Growth Management Hearings Board, the County has lost because they failed to follow the state land use laws or Whatcom County's own Comprehensive Plan. My job experience as a scientist, working with local governments, makes me qualified to ensure our county follows state land use laws, so we have a predictable future with urban and rural areas clearly defined. We've lost hundreds of acres of irreplaceable farmland to development. I'll work maintain 100,000 acres of working farms, ensuring water for farms, not urban sprawl on farmland. I support training for new farmers and loans to buy farmland and development rights, so we preserve our rich farming legacy with better food security for all of us.
When a downzone isn't required by law or board/court order, do you believe it's ever appropriate to downzone land without compensating the landowner? If so, when?
When the community supports paying for a service then we need to fund that service. We need to leave all options open in order to maintain the level of critical services to serve our diverse County population.
Other than the above, what are the most important issues facing Whatcom County and how would you address them?
No.
Elected office you seek: Whatcom County Council, District 2, Position B
Age: 51
Family: wife Sherri Crawford; two grown daughters, Sara and Jennifer
Education: Some college
Work experience: owner, Emerald Lake Consulting, permitting and land-use assistance; various past positions in retail and business management and sales.
Civic experience: 12 years on Whatcom County Council, previous service on County Planning Commission, service on numerous local boards and committees, currently serve on Washington State Transportation Improvement Board.
Major endorsements: I have not been specifically seeking endorsements, but I have responded to nearly all inquiring entities who have presented questionnaires, and I attend all interviews, forums and debates to which I have been invited.
Campaign website: votesamcrawford.com
Email: sam@votesamcrawford.com
Q and A
Candidates answered the following questions in their own words. These are unedited; candidates were limited to 300 words per questions.
What are your views on the proposed coal and bulk cargo terminal at Cherry Point and the train traffic that would be associated with it?
I'm for environmentally sustainable development at Cherry Point. If the proponents of the shipping (coal) terminal can demonstrate how their proposal meets that criteria, then it will be permitted. It's clear to me the 'impacts' go beyond the location of the facility itself, as the transport of materials via rail is part of the proposal. This rail-dependence obviously does have impact to Bellingham, Ferndale and other communities along the way, and must be thoroughly evaluated and mitigated. As a part of the permitting authority, I will remain objective and fair in my review of this proposal.
Where should the new jail be located, how big should it be and how should it be paid for?
The Slater Road area was selected appropriately and with careful analysis, and has been endorsed by the Sheriff and county administration. A 'right-sized' jail for near-term needs (about 600 - 800 beds) has been anticipated all along, and the area around Slater can be sized to accommodate future expansion needs. We are able to bond new jail construction today - with no additional tax increases - to the tune of about 70 million dollars.
What can Whatcom County do to bring more jobs to the area?
At an urban level, Ferndale in particular is ensuring developers of commercial and retail space will do so in a manner that meets and fulfills community expectations, environmental protection, and long-term economic growth. Meanwhile the Whatcom County Council completed its 'rural element' review with an eye to removing restrictions to business growth in the traditional 'crossroads' areas of the county. Business is the economic engine of Whatcom County, and without consideration for solutions that create a 'win' for business we would see our prosperity and quality of life reduced to economic stagnation, which would result in poverty and misery.
Should the county, in its next budget, take whatever steps necessary to halt the draining of general fund reserves? If so, how?
The county council provides close budget oversight working with the county administration. In particular the council maintains a policy of keeping the county 'general fund' reserve balance minimum of 10 percent of annual general fund revenue.
The term 'halt the draining' is misleading as the general fund reserves have been relatively stable during the period 2008 ($10.95M remaining) through 2011 ($10.59M remaining). The more important point is that the council must stay resolved to balance the budget without raising property taxes. We've done that in the toughest of economic times, and will continue to do so.
When do you believe, if ever, tax or fee increases are appropriate? Would they be on the table if you were elected?
The current financial challenges require a continued commitment to do more with less, prioritize services and not increase your tax bill. In fact, in the 12 years I've served on the Whatcom County Council, I have never voted for an overall increase in the county portion of your property taxes. Beginning next year, we will have a new County Executive and the administration will undergo a period of transition. Experienced leadership and input from the County Council will be more important than ever.
Do you support shifting property tax authority from dedicated funds, like the road fund, to the general fund?
Yes, there are often times where priorities for essential services such as law enforcement response and other 'capacity' concerns in the criminal justice system will take precedence over traditional revenue assignment. There shouldn't be a knee-jerk response by government to raise taxes every time a priority decision should be made. When it comes to public works projects such as road maintenance, we have not compromised (nor will we) in maintaining our current infrastructure before embarking on costly new construction projects.
Have public employees made enough concessions in these tough economic times?
I'm proud of the employees of Whatcom County government, they've endured a workforce reduction of about 17 percent over the past several years. Most of the 800 remaining employees are currently not getting paid for about 2 weeks of time off, spread out throughout the year; meanwhile the County continues to provide a substantial level of services to its citizens. I'll continue to work closely with the administration in negotiating with county unions fairly and respectfully, while ensuring that compensation and benefit gains and/or reductions are equally shared by union and non-union employees.
Do you support the transfer of nearly 9,000 acres in the Lake Whatcom watershed to county control for use as parkland? Why or why not?
Yes. Conversion to park uses will create public access in a beautiful area. The land does not currently generate property tax revenue, so none will be lost. The potential timber revenue for schools can be offset by the ongoing lease revenue for cell towers and other infrastructure that currently exists. Meanwhile, the timberlands remaining to the northeast will be consolidated for more efficient timber harvest management. I love outdoor recreation, and I believe the new park designation will become a popular amenity for local use and regional tourism. This is a win-win for our community.
What should Whatcom County do, if anything, to halt the growth and planning lawsuits between Bellingham and the county?
Bellingham government has at times been openly hostile toward Whatcom County in litigation. One example is the city's recent failed petition to the state demanding a ban on 'exempt wells' outside the city with no prior discussion with the County. Unilateral actions by the city regarding county issues are nonproductive. Recently the county council held off on a vote regarding the future of the Yew Street area so further county discussion with and response to city officials' concerns regarding growth planning can be made. It is our hope Bellingham officials will respond with respect and constructive comments.
When a downzone isn't required by law or board/court order, do you believe it's ever appropriate to downzone land without compensating the landowner? If so, when?
Downzoning has big impacts on property values, not to mention personal expectations and plans. If government decreases the use of someone's land for 'the greater good' of other citizens in the area, it should only be in cases of extreme emergency or clear threat to public health and safety. In those cases, there should at least be discussion regarding and consideration of the financial impact to the owner. There are other ways to achieve less housing density in a particular area if that's the goal. Trading 'development rights' and other incentive zoning methods are preferable to destroying someone's life savings.
Other than the above, what are the most important issues facing Whatcom County and how would you address them?
We are working with city and county fire districts to continue and improve the Emergency Medical System response throughout Whatcom County. The current system administered by the City of Bellingham has been fraught with union conflict, resulting in decisions that don't always keep patient care as the top priority. The County Council passed a resolution last year to re-organize the administration of the system, and constructive meetings are currently taking place to create a new management model that assures top quality care combined with the benefits of local accountability, cost-effectiveness and faster response times.
Elected office you seek: Whatcom County Council, District 3, Position B
Age: 73
Family: wife Kathy Black, three grown children, six grandchildren
Education: bachelor of science in electrical engineering from Lafayette College in Easton, Penn.
Work experience: 33 years for United Airlines as pilot; 51/2 years for Airlift Northwest in Seattle as pilot.
Civic experience: Blaine City Council member.
Major endorsements: Amalgamated Transit Union Local 843, Whatcom County Firefighters IAFF Local 106, Washington Conservation Voters, Sierra Club, Whatcom County Democrats.
Campaign website: votealanblack.com
Email: votealanblack@gmail.com
Facebook page: Vote Alan Black
Q and A
Candidates answered the following questions in their own words. These are unedited; candidates were limited to 300 words per questions.
What are your views on the proposed coal and bulk cargo terminal at Cherry Point and the train traffic that would be associated with it?
We have recently learned that the original plan for the shipment of 8 million tons of bulk commodities has been modified to permit the shipment of 54 million tons of coal, and possibly other commodities. My concern is that our local environment could be placed in jeopardy by greatly increased rail traffic to transport this tonnage and the attendant disruption to many communities. The promise of jobs and tax revenues must be balanced against the long term environmental consequences of building this facility. The proposed terminal project will have to meet a high standard in order to maintain the quality of our environment and health of our citizens. County Council members will be voting on findings provided in the Environmental Impact Statement. If elected, I would insist on clear, honest, and comprehensive answers to these issues: number of jobs created, return on public investment, effects on human health and quality of life, protection of vital marine habitat, and preserving a healthy environment. The cost to taxpayers for infrastructure improvements to connect bisected areas of our communities to allow for emergency response and commerce needs to be weighed against the economic benefit of job creation. The scope of the Environmental Impact Statement should be increased to encompass concerns expressed by all stakeholders. The routing of rail traffic through a community other than Bellingham will still present the same issues and will require the same thorough answers.
Where should the new jail be located, how big should it be and how should it be paid for?
The questions of location, size and how to pay for a new jail remain undecided at this time. Planning for the new facility will have to be reviewed and approved following a robust public comment period. In order to reduce operating costs for the jail we must look at all innovative programs and mental health services that have been shown to reduce the need for incarceration. The current Jail Task Force should also be charged with determining the cost benefit analysis of various programs and recommending those programs that are most cost effective. The task force should also gather data from other communities that have been successful in reducing their jail population to identify best practices that we can utilize here. It is more economical to fund programs that keep people out of jail than to provide more inmate beds at the cost of nearly $30,000 per bed. By reducing the need for inmate beds, the size and cost of the jail can be reduced to the point where it can be afforded by the community. In addition, as a long term cost control measure, programs to support offenders as they re-enter society will help to reduce recidivism and support the re-building of productive lives. Funding for construction of the new jail will have to be via bonding and a voter referendum to approve the bond. At present, conditions for inmates and corrections staff at the Division Street temporary facility appear far superior to the downtown jail. We should consider co-locating another temporary facility until the major issues of size, design, location, and funding of the new jail can be resolved, as well as the funding for alternatives to incarceraton.
What can Whatcom County do to bring more jobs to the area?
Our community cannot wait for answers to come from the outside. We must deploy our incredible local resources and talents to create our own destiny. Further, we can: streamline and/or fastrack local business permitting policies to support business; utilize the web to update our outreach and marketing expertise to attract employers from national and international markets; provide incentives to expedite new entrants into our business community; excite, encourage and support local entrepreneurs by providing job incubating space, technical support, child care support, and access to loan programs to get ideas off the ground; encourage strategic business outreach and counseling to assist small business owners to reach global markets. Appoint a blue ribbon panel from many fields (agriculture, service, cultural, medical, technical, manufacturing and education) to generate a variety of job and business stimulating ideas that have the potential to create jobs in our county. Invest in energy efficiency to provide jobs and cost savings to homeowners and businesses. Encourage businesses to take on interns who can gain job skills while waiting to be hired. Support efforts to recruit and guide job seekers into training programs. Continue to support mass transit to allow workers to reach their place of employment or job training.
Should the county, in its next budget, take whatever steps necessary to halt the draining of general fund reserves? If so, how?
The first principle we must follow is to obey the law in regard to utilizing the general fund reserves. I would need to know if they are be used for emergencies or disasters, or can a percentage of them be used for a rainy day fund. I would also like to know what has been the trend line of the general fund decreases over time. I am a fiscal conservative, but I also understand that revenues have been declining while needs have increased. This may be the appropriate time to draw down general funds to underpin the health, safety, transportation and other essential needs of our community. As economic conditions improve, the general fund must returned to adequate levels. Council members are entrusted with the public's money and it is incumbent on them to allocate it according to law, with prudence and wisdom. A five or ten year plan with agreed upon goals and priorities should be standard procedure for expenditure of revenues.
When do you believe, if ever, tax or fee increases are appropriate? Would they be on the table if you were elected?
Generally, I believe in balancing the budget without asking for increased taxes. I think now is a good time to review business start-up fees for possible reductions to stimulate business growth. The decrease in fees would be offset by the increase in sales tax revenues and personal income spent in the community. Any initiatives to raise taxes could always be on the table, but the decision to raise taxes would certainly have to be put before the voting public. An increase in fees should be thoroughly discussed and explained to the public before implementation.
Do you support shifting property tax authority from dedicated funds, like the road fund, to the general fund?
I generally do not support shifting funds from one dedicated account to meet the needs of another. This practice does not promote accountability or transparency in budgeting or government spending. This practice also invites the perception in the public's mind that they are not getting what they thought they were voting for. I can foresee the need to transfer funds from one account to another to meet an emergency. I also can also see the benefit of borrowing from one account for a specific purpose with the knowledge that the funds will be replaced in due course. To transfer funds between accounts on an on-going basis is not an acceptable practice.
Have public employees made enough concessions in these tough economic times?
It is the responsibility of employers to explore and utilize every possible avenue to cut costs without resorting to layoffs and other concessions from employees. For example, in Blaine we have reduced employment costs by changing medical coverage from one provider to another and changing levels of coverage. I would oppose out-sourcing of public services and would deal fairly with unions in order to achieve overall payroll savings. It is only fair to have all members of the workforce share equally the burden of sacrifice, should the need become severe enough to require further cuts.
Do you support the transfer of nearly 9,000 acres in the Lake Whatcom watershed to county control for use as parkland? Why or why not?
Yes, I fully support the transfer of nearly 9,000 acres of the Lake Whatcom watershed into the Lake Whatcom Forest Preserve for use as parkland. This would be a big step toward safeguarding the drinking water supply for Bellingham, and for part of the county. By transferring this property, clearing and construction of logging roads and clear cut logging would no longer take place. Runoff from these practices contribute to the phosphorus build-up in Lake Whatcom, increasing the algae growth and the resulting need for water treatment. I would suggest that activities allowed in the park would be more restricted to avoid further pollution of Lake Whatcom from stormwater runoff. Note: All methods should be explored to reduce polluting stormwater runoff: for example, there is a project at the Peace Arch Crossing which states, "LEED Sustainable Site, A different kind of storm system. This project employs a revolutionary storm drainage system. Rainwater carrying oils and other pollutants from the roadway is transferred into the ground through pervious concrete under each parking stall. The water flows into the swale, where a special soil mixture has been developed specifically for this project - the first time this has been done in Canada. Bacteria in this soil mixture consume the pollutants in the storm water, and most of the water is dispersed into the soil rather than continuing into the storm sewer."
What should Whatcom County do, if anything, to halt the growth and planning lawsuits between Bellingham and the county?
I would propose that a formalized collaborative working group be established between the Bellingham staff and Whatcom County staff. This collaboration needs to occur at the point of project generation, so that a consensus can be built in the very early stages and differing viewpoints can be resolved before the project or initiative goes forward. It is also important that both entities come into basic agreement that compliance with the Growth Management Act will be the foundation upon which agreements will be made and projects begun. The spirit of the GMA is to ensure that cities can provide needed services to their populations and that rural areas will be spared urban sprawl and continue to be productive agricultural land. By being in compliance with the GMA, investors, developers, farmers, homeowners and citizens will have certainty as to the future development of the county. Lawsuits are destructive to relationships and expensive to resolve.
When a downzone isn't required by law or board/court order, do you believe it's ever appropriate to downzone land without compensating the landowner? If so, when?
Land is an emotional topic for most of us. Our farming heritage in Whatcom County is almost two centuries old and it is an integral part of the character of our county. It is an economic engine in its own right and produces $326 million a year. There will always be pressure to open more land to development and to ease restrictions on building. To mitigate the pressure on farmers to subdivide their lands, there needs to be systems of support to compensate farmers for their loss of development rights. The purchase or transfer of development rights are just two ways in which farmland can be preserved. There must be more public awareness surrounding the protection of agricultural lands so that the public can understand the value of the lands and be willing to protect our farming legacy while it still exists and is viable. To keep our farming heritage intact a core agricultural base of 100,000 acres must be maintained. If we go below this base, the infrastructure supporting our farmers dwindles and farming eventually becomes unsustainable. Downzoning has been approached as one way to sustain our farmland base, but it raises ethical questions regarding what a farmer can do with his investment. In order to make this a winning situation for developers as well as conservationists, we should further efforts to identify areas where farming is unlikely to succeed and more appropriately developed, and preserve our superb soils for farming.
Other than the above, what are the most important issues facing Whatcom County and how would you address them?
Not at this time.
Elected office you seek: Whatcom County Council, District 3, Position B
Age: 65
Family: husband Ed Morris; sons Wesley Brenner, 31, Collin Morris, 26.
Education: Some college and many classes regarding business, environment, restoration, child care, mental health, low-impact development, local history,
Work experience: Hospice work, caregiver for developmentally disabled children, furniture refinisher, commercial artist, small farm forester.
Civic experience: Trees for Streams participant; 10-Mile Watershed Early Action Committee; RSVP Volunteer; Hovander House docent; Sean Humphries Hospice House board member; Black Mountain Forestry board member; Rome Grange member; Northwest Womens' Hall of Fame Steering Committee member; longest sitting member of Whatcom County Mental Health Advisory Board; Master Gardener; Leadership America Forum panelist; Substance Abuse Prevention Task Force (STAR); Citrizens for Fair Property Assessment member; Whatcom Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Committee; Whatcom County Medical Society Auxilliary Legislative Committee, community liason; Washington State Infectious Waste Technical Advisory Committee; North Bellingham Elementary PTO secretary; Director of Safe Waste Management Now citizen committee; organizer of Community Building Conference at Western Washington University; moderator for American Association of Univesity Women Growth Forum; Junior Achievement volunteer; Ferndale High FFA volunteer; Ferndale Boys and Girls Club volunteer.
Major endorsements: Not accepting endorsements or campaign donations.
Campaign website: barbarabrenner.info
Email: bbgun1010@aol.com; mail her at 5617 Northwest Road, Bellingham, WA 98226
Q and A
Candidates answered the following questions in their own words. These are unedited; candidates were limited to 300 words per questions.
What are your views on the proposed coal and bulk cargo terminal at Cherry Point and the train traffic that would be associated with it?
According to our county attorney and Open Public Meetings Ombudsman for State Attorney General, in addition to information I received from Municipal Research Services Center (the non-profit that gives legal advice to all jurisdictions), council members are precluded from researching, discussing, or participating in any way on this issue until it makes its way through the public process and gets to us. If we take a biased position on this before we hear it as judges we can be prevented from voting. When it gets to the council we can take the time we need, and do whatever research we need, including contacting those who submitted information to our Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) staff person. We will have access to all information received through the EIS process (I have details I send out to anyone who contacts me). If we need more information, we can request it. We can take tours and in other ways collect whatever we need. Although candidates are not subject to the Appearance of Fairness Doctrine, they could still be prevented from voting on this issue if they make biased comments during the election and become council members, because there is another law that ensures an applicant has an unbiased hearing. I can say, and my record shows I have a long history of supporting public health issues. I also support business. I do not see support of public health and business as being mutually exclusive in most cases.
Where should the new jail be located, how big should it be and how should it be paid for?
We should wait for recommendations from the transparent, public jail task force before making location decisions. There will also be recommendations for size from the task force. However, I want more and better alternatives for non-violent offenders (those who may hurt themselves, but not others) included, which I believe might reduce size needs. It should be paid through the existing jail sales tax the voters passsed. This could be done through bonding since we are eligible for very low interest rate. The bond would be paid back using existing sales tax money. A lot of money was wasted through a very bad contract with an incompetent consultant to do an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for size and location. Initially the consultant did a preliminary study that was very flawed. I voted against proceeding with the EIS using the same contractor (and said we should demand to be repaid what we already spent) but the EIS contract was recommended by the administration and passed by the council majority. It cost much money and was done behind closed doors. That is why we are so far behind and why we need transparency and changes.
What can Whatcom County do to bring more jobs to the area?
We need substantive code scrubs and other planning efforts to assist businesses in locating/expanding/thriving here. Government does not create jobs. It is up to government to ensure predictable, reasonable regulations for businesses while protecting the environment. I believe some fees are way out of line for permits. We also have regulations that contradict each other. We have talked about streamlining the permit process but haven't done much. If we want more environmentally friendly development, and I do, we need to create better incentives and make it easier for businesses to do that.
Should the county, in its next budget, take whatever steps necessary to halt the draining of general fund reserves? If so, how?
Yes. We can do it by prioritizing our needs over our wants. Although the council has given many ideas to the administration, at the last budget the administration did not recommend many. For example, the administration claimed it would consider consolidation of departments but brought no recommendations to do so. I made consolidation recommendations that were discouraged by the administration and voted down by the council majority. Consolidation would help reduce costs while maintaining front line staff. Other jurisdictions have consolidated departments and reduced costs while retaining front line services.
When do you believe, if ever, tax or fee increases are appropriate? Would they be on the table if you were elected?
I do not believe we should consider tax increases. Many people are barely hanging on. I especially believe primary property taxes are regressive. Some of the fees I see already seem high for the service. Although I have requested it in the past, I have never been able to obtain information that shows why some are so high. I have also made recommendations to change some fees to hourly rates only instead of some of the one-size-fits-all fees currently used, which can punish applicants who don't need much county time. Fees are legally supposed to be only for service, not to make up for any deficits. I support adequate fees to pay for services but there needs to always be proof that the fee amount actually reflects the service.
Do you support shifting property tax authority from dedicated funds, like the road fund, to the general fund?
Funds are dedicated to protect the services to which they are dedicated. If we believe dedicated funds are no longer necessary we should simply eliminate them because there are costs associated with maintaining dedicated funds. I don't think we should shift any more money from the road fund to the general fund because our public works director recently told us our road fund is diminishing.
Have public employees made enough concessions in these tough economic times?
I think Whatcom County public servants have made many concessions. I can't speak for other public servants because I have not been following their specifics. We are all public servants, more simply employees. I would rather use that term.
Do you support the transfer of nearly 9,000 acres in the Lake Whatcom watershed to county control for use as parkland? Why or why not?
No. That money is needed to protect water quality in watershed by retrofitting existing development/roads and reducing new development. The area proposed for transfer is already public property. No development rights ever legally allowed. We would only transfer liability from state to county. State Departments of Ecology and Health determined current state forestry practices in watershed are benign activities. All state land is restored/replanted after logging. Also, we passed stringent forestry plan for state managed lands in the watershed which prevents logging of much of area. While landslides naturally occur, our plan ensures they don't occur from forestry practices. Transferring the property legally requires publicly advertising the transferred park. That will bring many more people, more traffic/noxious weeds/diseases/harmful insects/four-wheelers. There will be ongoing high costs to manage transferred land. Transfer still requires periodic logging and has no measurable water quality benefits. Whatcom County's history was built on renewable natural resources. Forestry is a renewable natural resource that also supplies good paying jobs and funds for the school districts. Especially in the Lake Whatcom Watershed we have excellent safeguards to protect the watershed in state managed forestry land. Outside state managed land in watershed I support purchase of Galbraith because it will eliminate development rights, require our landscape plan to be used (not required on private land), allow recreation to continue, and could provide public funds if we allow green builders to create low impact park chalets for rent (public/private partnership).
What should Whatcom County do, if anything, to halt the growth and planning lawsuits between Bellingham and the county?
I don't think the county can do anything to stop lawsuits from the city of Bellingham except to always do only what the city wants. While I try hard to work with the city, and agree with the city on many issues, I don't think I was elected to simply agree with the city on everything. Whatcom County hasn't filed any lawsuits against the city. I believe Whatcom County has made many concessions to the city of Bellingham. I will continue to work with the city and hope there will come a time when the city will reduce or stop filing lawsuits against the county. I would consider mediation at times when we can't agree.
When a downzone isn't required by law or board/court order, do you believe it's ever appropriate to downzone land without compensating the landowner? If so, when?
No. We have plenty of laws/orders telling us what we need to do. I can't see any reason to do more downzones than what we need to do to comply with the law without compensation. If we are going beyond the law, such as in the case of public health protection, we are stating in effect, we are doing something for the public as a whole. So, in those cases landowners should be compensated by public funds. I also believe if we downzone beyond what the law requires without compensation, we are in effect eliminating predictability people have the right to expect from our government.
Other than the above, what are the most important issues facing Whatcom County and how would you address them?
The most important issues facing local government are public health protection, public safety, predictability, environmental protection, and ensuring every resident receives assistance when he/she needs it from his/her county council representative. It should not matter whether residents have a big group behind them or whether they are alone in their needs. We need to be there for everyone. We have lots of work to do to earn/maintain public trust. But it is our highest responsibility and without it we won't adequately be able to provide all other essential public services.
